Author Archives: JMorgan

Biblical and Cultural Imperative to #ReimagineCompassion

Nov 24, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
No Comments

Nearly 20 years ago, Meet The Need was founded because eradicating poverty and sharing the Gospel weren’t lucrative enough to incent innovation by for-profit software companies.  While technology vendors focused on building ERP and eCommerce solutions, Meet The Need was investing in platforms to mobilize churches and ministries to serve struggling families.  Modern tools from the business world could foster collaboration in a highly fragmented charitable marketplace, but only a ministry with a bottom line measured in disciples, not dollars, would spend millions knowing collaboration required offering those systems at no charge.  Churches had been the food bank and homeless shelter for nearly 2000 years, but increasingly separated evangelism from compassion, letting government and ministries assume primary responsibility for serving the hungry and homeless.  But Jesus modeled caring before sharing, so Meet The Need’s goal became reuniting the entire body of Christ to bless those in desperate need of help and hope.

Many pastors and ministry leaders were requesting a way to bridge the communication gap between those in need and those who could help.  Churches and ministries were managing and coordinating compassion work with spreadsheets, post-it notes and static information on a web page.  So Meet The Need began building volunteer management, event management. and case management applications at a time when nearly none existed.  With Meet The Need, suddenly they had state-of-the-art tools to recruit volunteers, run outreach events and track assistance provided to families across the city.  Meet The Need quickly grew and had tremendous impact around the country – as it does today.

However, despite our mission to engage Christians in serving the poor year-round, Meet The Need watched as activity spiked during the holiday season and dissipated thereafter.  Checking the proverbial box wasn’t alleviating poverty or changing lives.  Meanwhile, Millennials were driving volunteerism momentum and demand, providing software vendors opportunities to monetize those products.  Entire industries emerged with competitors selling expensive volunteering, event planning and shared case management solutions.  In an effort to increase revenues, lines began to blur – event software provided ticket sale options and donor systems incorporated capabilities to help charities convert volunteers quickly into givers.  Institutional fundraising encouraged creating dependence on handouts rather than empowering families to become self-sufficient.  The goal became keeping the charity in business rather than working its way out of a job.

Once again, it’s time for Meet the Need to pave the way in innovation.  We’ve observed and learned enough over the past 20 years to recognize the flaws in the status quo – and we’re objective enough to change course because our vision isn’t tainted by the lure of maximizing shareholder value.  There’s no money, but much more impact and dignity, in decreasing reliance on transactional assistance from donor-driven organizations.  We also foresaw years ago dynamics now in full effect that will soon force a shift in how assistance is provided to those living in poverty.  In fact, Meet The Need has invested the past 2 ½ years and hundreds of thousands of dollars in a new platform that will revolutionize service delivery to families.  We’re again building what no one else wants to because it’s not popular or lucrative enough – and doing so in the Lord’s perfect timing as those dynamics are accelerating rapidly in the direction we were already heading.

Why #ReimagineCompassion?

If churches and ministries don’t #ReimagineCompassion now, it will become apparent tomorrow that today’s solutions to alleviating human suffering no longer work – and actually perpetuate poverty.  Current trends will soon leave them with no choice but to empower families to take greater responsibility for their welfare, helping them plot their own course to a better future.

  1. Poverty Dynamics – Cycles of generational poverty haven’t been broken by programs or events that dole out funds or resources, both of which are likely to be in shorter supply going forward
  2. Kingdom Dynamics – Fewer Americans than ever acknowledge that each individual is made in God’s image and of immeasurable value, deserving of the dignity inherent in self-sustainability, which is where life transformation begins
  3. Political Dynamics – New leadership in Washington may position itself as savior to the poor, providing impetus for churches and ministries to replace handouts with personal, loving relationships that position Jesus as Savior
  4. Economic Dynamics – Social pressures, higher taxes and economic bubbles will continue to decrease per capita giving to Christian organizations, requiring greater cost effectiveness
  5. Institutional Dynamics – Diminishing trust and loyalty in institutions, combined with the disintermediation caused by COVID-19, may necessitate decentralization of compassion
  6. Church Dynamics – Attractional models centered on buildings, pastors and self-interest haven’t grown the overall “body” or produced sacrificial disciples who understand the importance Jesus placed on helping the poor
  7. Cultural Dynamics – In a society where “sin”, “repentance” and “Jesus” are not in the accepted vernacular, the mandate for every believer to live out the Great Commission will require more than just words
  8. Discipleship Dynamics – A biblical definition of “church” entails equipping individuals to shine a light on Christ’s righteousness, exposing the world’s need for Him and opening the door for in-depth conversations, not invitations to next Sunday’s worship service

There’s an urgent need today for churches and ministries to unite around a more biblical approach to helping families in need – to #ReimagineCompassion.  As society becomes increasingly hostile to Christianity, our only defense against hatred is love, which we can demonstrate by modeling a more relational, sustainable and effective approach to serving the “least of these”.

MTN’s New Family Empowerment Platform

Ironically, this new system represents a return to Meet The Need’s roots.  Retracing our strategic progression over the last 20 years, MTN began by helping churches build a “web” of support around local families.  But our scope expanded as pastors and ministry leaders began to realize someone had finally brought modern tools to “reconnect the dots”.  Then national and regional charities asked us to customize our systems to address specific causes like hunger relief, homelessness and foster care.  We hope and pray that going back to our family-centered origins will lead to impact even beyond what we’ve already experienced, like facilitating the world’s largest food rescue network, rerouting nearly 2.5 billion pounds to shelters and agencies that feed the poor.

Guiding principles and capabilities of Meet The Need’s revamped platform include:

  • Leverage Artificial Intelligence to personalize suggestions for connections and opportunities that fit the interests and skills of families and volunteers
  • Rather than “push” organizations to use software, “pull” family, friends, churches, ministries, businesses and service providers into enduring, relational circles around those in need
  • Understand and display the assets available across each city, reflecting the value of all it has to offer, possibly including jobs for the unemployed or underemployed
  • Focus not only on impact, but on spiritual growth by recommending scripture and materials best suited for an individual’s unique circumstances
  • Allow churches and ministries to customize their own version of the application to equip families in their networks to support one another, lifting the burden on organizational budgets

Meet The Need started designing this platform in late 2017 and just completed a Beta-ready version!  Now we need your prayer and support to begin rolling it out to Christ-centered organizations who are excited and ready to test and launch in the weeks and months ahead.

It’s Your Turn… 

Join the #ReimagineCompassion revolution by praying, donating, sharing this blog post on social media, and personally engaging with families in ways that truly transform lives.

Urgency of Unity in a Nation Divided

Nov 12, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
one comments

Our nation is at a crucial juncture.  Whether we accelerate toward our demise or reverse course toward the Lord hinges on what happens the next few months – or weeks.  Churches and Christians will either show a nation divided what unity looks like or miss the best opportunity in decades to demonstrate the radical love of Jesus to a society intolerant of differing opinions.

The Presidential and Congressional elections clearly displayed the depth of America’s division.  With militias forming, protests raging, recounts pending, and anger spewing there is no better time to shine a bright light into pitch black darkness.  Yet with COVID-19 threatening the survival of countless churches and persecution looming for Christians at risk of losing jobs for holding countercultural beliefs, it is tempting to worry right now about our own interests and not the bigger Kingdom picture.  While churches scramble and pray for an end to the pandemic so they can return to normal, believers inundate the social media airwaves with personal feelings about their next President or Senator.

Soon the window will close and Christians will have dashed their hopes and dreams for revival by their own self-centeredness, oblivious to what could have been if they had only understood that convincing the world of Jesus’ lordship and love depends on one thing – unity.  After this election in this nation at this time, we must live differently, love differently, defy the world’s division and unite around what all Christians have in common – or watch as secularization further infiltrates the landscape and law of the land.

We Could Divide…

Fast forward and picture the State of the Union or the State of the Church address in 2024.  We’re inclined to think both will be predicated on the events of the past week.  However, election of a church-friendly President in 2016 did not lead to church or spiritual growth in America.  Politics does not determine the strength of a country’s churches or the faith of its citizens.  No doubt, Christianity is likely to face powerful headwinds that threaten to diminish its impact, influence and perception in society.  However, given the rapid decline in those departments over the past four years, we are left to wonder whether the Church would have fared any better under President Trump’s rival.  Christianity historically tends to thrive under pressure and ultimately answers to Jesus, not the federal government.

The feet of all Christ-followers should be on the Rock, but we will appear divided to a watching world to the degree that we each succumb to temptations to…

  1. FIT IN – Becoming disingenuously politically correct to avoid hassles, maintain a standard of living or attract church members.  Adopting society’s revised and unabridged dictionary of religious terms that offend “snowflakes” like “sin”, “truth” and “Jesus” – without which it becomes impossible to share the Gospel.  Making faith about this life – worldly and practical – touting what it can do for “me”.
  2. GIVE IN – Surrendering to the political and social establishment, calling it “staying out of politics”, “not being judgmental” or “none of my business”.  Obeying the command to submit to authority but in the process compromising the values that should unite Christians.  Not following the example of Jesus who criticized leaders who chose self-righteousness over love, compassion and justice.
  3. FACE OFF – Fighting for survival of an individual church at the expense of the universal church by “fitting in” or “giving in”.  Defending the status quo, the right to build a church without building disciples.  Engaging the culture war through an air war of verbal bombs rather than a ground war with love and compassion as our chosen weapons.
  4. CLOSE OFF – Fearing the worst and protecting turf, retreating inside the comfortable confines of a church building surrounded by fellow believers.  Becoming a passive, pensive or private Christian rather than a multiplicative disciple-maker.  Worrying about minor resistance today, leading to paralysis that opens the door soon to real persecution.
  5. MOUTH OFF – Holding society to Christianity’s standards when non-believers haven’t adopting those standards as their own.  Imposing morality has become the focus of evangelicals during this election but unity in the body of Christ will never happen around moral issues.  We must lead people to accept the authority of Jesus before expecting them to obey God’s laws.

Any post-election self-righteousness or self-interest will divide the Christian community along those lines, making us look just like the world instead of presenting an attractive alternative.

We Could Unite…

Being like-minded means having the “same attitude of mind toward each other that Christ Jesus had” who wants us to be “perfectly united in mind and thought” with no divisions.  Thinking alike and living together in harmony entails having the same desires, passions, and ambitions.  Yet we see Christians reacting quite differently to the election results, presumably all aware that God is still on the throne but more vocal about their anxiety, anger or excitement over who will occupy the White House.  Now is the time to sacrifice personal opinions for Kingdom goals…

  1. POUR IN – The lost need the Gospel, seekers need answers to tough questions, and lukewarm believers need repentance.  Teaching truth, not a “better life”, would lead millions more to experience God’s forgiveness and amazing grace.
  2. BUILD UP – Spiritual infants need to reach maturity, marked by humility, dying daily to self and equipped to be a reproducing disciple, not an active church member.
  3. SEND OUT – We are not all a “hand” or a “foot” in the body of Christ, but we are each called to be the “hands and feet” of Christ.  Claiming evangelism or discipleship “isn’t my gifting” isn’t a valid excuse.
  4. PAY FORWARD – What is poured into us should spill over and pour out, but most churches do compassion only infrequently and transactionally.  We need to #ReimagineCompassion and realize investing year-round in helping the poor is a mandate, not an option, for those who are saved.
  5. LOOK FORWARD – The election does not change our eternal reality, which all Christians share.  Each believer’s future is secure so faith should overcome our fears and uncertainties in this life, no matter who is in charge on Capitol Hill.

Believers should all agree on these guiding principles, but they take a back seat today to the prevailing message of Christian music and messages – that Jesus came to save me, die for me and help me through my troubles.

Roadmap to Unity in a Divided World…

To present a unified front at this critical moment in the history of our nation and the American Church, we urge every pastor to get on the same page now by following these five steps…

  1. Common Sense of Urgency – Like 9/11 when Americans suddenly put aside their petty differences when an attack threated all of us, God’s children must overlook what divides them
  2. Common Identity – Confess that “church” is not a place, building, leaders or a weekly event and partner with other Christ-centered organizations to pursue the real “customer”
  3. Common Mission – Reconsider dynamics that have driven division (e.g. expensive brick-and-mortar, staff-heavy models to attract consumers) as the economic and cultural environment for churches becomes more challenging
  4. Common Metrics – Scrap “butts and bucks” as measuring sticks and adopt shared metrics to incent team-oriented participation in city-wide Prayer/Care/Share strategies
  5. Common Example – Demonstrate our love and confess our sins to show our need for Christ’s righteousness, which will shine a spotlight and make humanity aware of its sinful nature

Powerful, well-entrenched forces are at work to prevent unity across churches and ministries.  Seminaries, denominations, theology, budgets, members, consultants, coaches, facilities, and egos all demand differentiation.  Unraveling church growth and Artificial Intelligence models designed to build walls between institutions and Christians will require an act of God – which is why we pray for Him to miraculously bring unity to a nation at a time when it’s in short supply.

It’s Your Turn…

Begin implementing the five steps above in your own life and at your church…and urge others to do the same before it’s too late!

Biblically or Politically Correct?

Oct 28, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
No Comments

#CastAnEternalVote before next Tuesday’s election!  You just get one vote for President and it only lasts for 4 years, but you can cast countless eternal votes that last forever by serving and sharing your faith with friends, neighbors or coworkers before November 3rd!

America’s Presidential and congressional election is less than a week away.  With so much at stake in 2020, Christians face a dilemma.  They’re tempted to speak their minds about pressing social issues that could be impacted by this election, but Biblically Correct (BC) may not be Politically Correct (PC).  BC comes at a high price.  PC conforms to cultural norms.  BC doesn’t.  Instead, it lovingly confronts the prevailing culture and risks one’s standing and security in a society intolerant of perceived insensitivity.

Sensitivity to PC values like equality, justice, human rights, and economic welfare for all citizens is inherently “BC”.  In fact, those principles are rooted in God’s Word.  The disconnect between PC and BC stems from the revisionist origin and meaning ascribed to those values by the vagaries of today’s culture rather than the standard of Scripture.  In fact, media and corporations impose dire consequences on those who don’t adopt their new definitions of equality (in marriage), justice (in victimhood), and human rights (in pregnancy).

Pressure is mounting to conform or be cancelled.  Reference to biblical perspectives that run counter to what is viewed as socially acceptable is considered hate-speak.  Christian entrepreneurs are compelled to comply with laws that defy biblical precepts.  HR departments refuse to hire or retain employees who do not disavow biblical views on hot-button issues.  “Coming out (of the closet)” is now more applicable to high school or college students who need great courage to declare they’re Christians and endure the stigma that label now carries with it.  Even many pastors hesitate to express BC truths about PC topics from the pulpit.

So most Christians choose to talk PC and quietly vote BC.  This seems like a good time to keep our mouths shut and let our voice be heard at the ballot box, or “vote with our feet” by boycotting companies that aren’t BC.  Our excuses for choosing PC over BC range from “sharing my faith isn’t my gifting” to “I never talk politics or religion” to “I can’t put my family’s financial future at risk”.  Church pews are filled with Passive Christians (no words or actions), Private Christians (actions without words) and Pensive Christians (words without action).

Biblically Correct

In contrast, Powerful Christians (i.e. disciples) don’t avoid confrontation for the sake of comfort, speaking out for the sake of security, or persecution for the sake of popularity.  During this election cycle and under the next administration, BC means…

  1. Campaigning for Jesus, not necessarily a candidate
  2. Trusting in the Lord as Savior, not government
  3. Praying for revival and repentance, not reestablishing Christendom
  4. Seeing “church” as a personal responsibility, not an institution
  5. Actively loving our neighbors to Christ, not blending in with the crowd
  6. Serving the poor year-round, not just during the holidays
  7. Using non-PC words like sin, heaven and hell, not tiptoeing around the Gospel

In summary, BC wins out over PC when individuals hear the Gospel, confess their sins, repent and turn their lives over to the Lord.  The Great Commission is a mandate Jesus gave to all His followers, not just elected officials.  This election can’t redeem culture, no matter which leaders gain power.  Legislation and court rulings will influence our nation’s morality but not its moral fabric, which has declined precipitously even under a church-friendly President.  The collective will of America’s voters will impact the level of resistance Christians face and the consequences they’ll suffer if they fail to be PC, but it won’t diminish the resolve of BC believers and churches.  Next Tuesday’s outcome can alter laws that non-believers must obey but can’t change their hearts.  Ultimately, human answers don’t solve spiritual problems – God does.   Earthly kingdoms don’t determine who’s part of God’s Kingdom – that His job.  In other words, faith in Christ makes us righteous, not the law.

Politically Correct

PC is not inherently bad.  Often its intention is not to offend out of genuine concern for those who’ve been maligned and mistreated.  However, in America, PC defines a set of unspoken rules restricting free speech imposed on all citizens regardless of their world views.  Compliance is required and enforced by public condemnation and humiliation.  Understanding the risks of voicing a stance considered offensive or a joke deemed distasteful by “decent” society, people carefully consider their words to avoid any inference of impropriety.  Those with the most to lose, in positions of influence and political power, are often PC zealots and quick to point out the failures of other leaders to demonstrate adequate sensitivity to gain the upper hand.

BC adherents are frequent violators and targets of PC authorities.  BC is less concerned with social standing than pleasing an Audience of One.  BC is rarely PC because…

  1. the mere mention of the name of Jesus in public settings has become taboo
  2. the Gospel appears as foolishness to the world because the word sin has been removed from culture’s vernacular and words like love and sacrifice have been redefined
  3. Christianity is the only religion considered acceptable to ridicule
  4. introduction of any moral code that competes with society’s is viewed as immoral
  5. faith threatens the right to do whatever makes someone happy without conscience or retribution
  6. claiming Jesus is the only path flies in the face of the perception that each person has the power to define “truth”
  7. pastors aren’t given credit for the role the Church played throughout history in securing rights for marginalized groups championed today by America’s anti-BC “woke”

PC therefore inhibits communication and suppresses reception of biblical truths.  If BC succumbs to PC then Christians and churches may face social ostracization here in the near future.  Lest that appear hyperbolic, consider Western Europe where cultural and political tides shifted rapidly, relegating evangelicals to a corner.

Living BC in a PC World

When Christians pass up opportunities and hesitate to talk about Jesus to preserve their status or reputation, they’ve chosen PC over BC.  When churches won’t address immorality running rampant in our nation and congregations in order to grow membership, they’ve chosen PC over BC.  Politically correct is incorrect for Christians and churches when it involves self-centered compromise.  BC living is active, compassionate, courageous and even sometimes offensive, as the world defines that term…

  1. Love in the Face of Hate – PC is not love.  It may be caring and considerate, but it is superficial in its carefulness and calculation.  Agape, unconditional love doesn’t count the cost whereas PC considers the price of non-conformance.  PC “love” seeks to make no one uncomfortable whereas BC love involves stepping on toes to do what is truly most loving – sacrificing our own comfort to lead someone toward Christ.
  2. Right Rather than Self-righteous – No matter what PC says, absolute truth exists.  The facts of God’s sacrifice and forgiveness can be conveyed in humility or pride.  Likewise, the reality of sin can be conveyed in humility or pride.  Speaking truth with grace isn’t about righteousness indignation or making political statements, but the Gospel.
  3. Confession Instead of Judgment – PC calls Christians hateful for speaking BC.  We must be careful not to deserve that label but admit our shortcomings so they can see our need for Christ as well.  We live in a glass house and need the panes to be transparent so non-believers can see Jesus through us.
  4. Relational Despite Resistance – Christians often defy PC, yelling at society to condemn its immorality, but the road to Jesus starts with relationships.  Eventually conversations must take place about repentance, but we must first earn the relational equity to broach hard topics.
  5. Intrusive When Desiring Distance – Jesus asked the next question everyone was thinking but was afraid to articulate.  Jesus was nosy because He wasn’t PC.  Excuses we make for not asking hard questions aren’t really about “minding our own business” but not loving enough to dig deeper.
  6. Vocal when Asked for Silence – There’s no way to talk about the good news without the bad news, forgiveness without sin, redemption without guilt, heaven without hell.   With so much hanging in the balance, Christians can’t afford to be PC right now.
  7. Kindness in Spite of Injustice – Jesus’ model was to lead with compassion before bringing a truth bomb – that He alone was the only way.  Feeding or healing was His means to open ears to hear what He had to say next – which was far from PC.

The pressure on Christians and churches to abide by society’s rules is intentional.  Politicians, activists and the media may be the ones revising history and redefining words, but don’t doubt for a second the reality that spiritual forces are battling for supremacy here.  Darkness always resists light, which is why the high beams of Christ need to shine brightly in this election.

It’s Your Turn…

#CastAnEternalVote before Election Day, November 3rd!  This “ice bucket challenge” doesn’t involve pouring cold water on your head!  Simply perform a simple act of service for someone you know or just met, tell us your story on our Facebook page with the hashtag #CastAnEternalVote, and then challenge 3 Christ-followers you know to “pay it forward”.  You only get one vote for President but can cast countless eternal votes that will last far longer than 4 years.  You have more ability to impact who is in God’s House than who’s in the White House!

Society’s Claim on the Moral High Ground

Oct 15, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
4 comments

Our “woke” nation holds high moral ideals.  We protest and fight for equality, justice, human rights, and economic welfare for all humanity.  Those noble principles include the implicit freedom of every man and woman from imposition of values that conflict with their personal definitions of those terms.  Every individual deserves unimpeded access to their own spiritual path and personal version of truth.

Our culture and media consider Christians to be in violation of that moral code because they make a truth claim and promote it against others’ wishes.  Yet that indictment and their self-proclaimed “enlightenment” fail to understand that Christianity is the source of nearly all the tenets they hold dear.  Jesus, His followers and His Church advocated, lived out and suffered for ideas – like love, humility, benevolence, sacrifice, servanthood, fairness, freedom, and the value of human life – that were considered radical in corrupt, hedonistic nations.

Disconnecting those high ideals from their (Christian) source enables the grand irony – using society’s claim on the high moral ground to justify rampant immorality.  In the name of equality and rights, the only “sinners” are those who criticize anyone’s morality.  In other words, the only moral code is that there is no moral code, except for any attempts to impose one.  No one may tell anyone what to do, except that everyone must adopt the premise that there is no moral foundation – or risk being “cancelled” (which can cost Christians jobs and promotions).

Language Barriers

All that’s required to usurp the high moral ground is to hijack terms that Christians once “owned”.  Redefining and trivializing words that fundamentally undergird the Christian faith renders future use of those terms by believers effectively pointless and irrelevant.  Nothing a Christian says will make sense when listeners apply new cultural definitions based on a secular world view.  For example, how can we describe the sacrificial, agape love of Jesus when the world only understands the word “love” to mean romance, lust or greed?  Nor is the Gospel story likely to resonate when the word “sin” has been dropped from the lexicon.

To better understand Scripture, we go back to the original Greek and Hebrew because the English words do not precisely capture the original intent.  Likewise, once society redefines a biblical concept, their translation of what Christians are saying when they use those words will not reflect the intended message.  Christians are speaking of the biblical definition, but non-believers interpret without that frame of reference.  The conversation is rendered almost as incoherent as two individuals speaking foreign languages to one another.

Change the meaning of the words and you eliminate any chance of a connection or breakthrough.  Those unwilling to confront the power of the Gospel, fearing it would mean abandoning their self-absorbed lifestyles, concocted a brilliant scheme to abscond the following biblical principles and terms:

  • Truth – from God’s Word to my opinion
  • Law – from guests in God’s house to owners who make the rules
  • Sin – from offensive to offended
  • Freedom – from (punishment for) sin to (the right to) sin
  • Purpose – from joy to happiness
  • Love – from Christ’s sacrifice to my satisfaction
  • Justice – from what Jesus didn’t deserve to what I’m owed
  • Accountability – from answering to God to true to myself
  • Generosity – from investing in Kingdom to leaving a legacy
  • Tolerance – from an open mind to a closed mouth
  • Shame – from my mistakes to another’s insults
  • Pride – from the most reviled sin to the supreme virtue
  • Righteous – from a divine declaration to an inalienable self-perception
  • Religion – from worship to works
  • Persecution – from freedom of religion to freedom from religion
  • Self-Centeredness – from shunned to praised
  • Servant – from humble submission to a tacit form of slavery
  • Integrity – from honesty to necessity
  • Ethics – from what’s right to what’s expedient
  • Compassion – from action to empathy
  • Anger – from biting my tongue to venting and revenge
  • Forgiveness – from unmerited grace to conditional stipulations
  • Morality – from willing obedience to religious oppression
  • Victim – from blatant abuse to crying foul
  • Evangelism – from invitations to eternal relationship with a loving Father to imposition of conflicting values on an innocent victim by a meddling intruder

The implications of this revised and unabridged dictionary of once-biblical terms are clear.  Incorrectly assume I own my own body and I can do whatever I want with it.  Claim victimhood for any accusations and I have extraordinary power to label and vilify the offender publicly.  Conflate servanthood or sacrifice with control or oppression and I can justify doing nothing for anyone.  Prioritize fun and family over mission and ministry and I am at liberty to seek my own interests exclusively.  The perpetrator in the Gospel story (mankind) now becomes the celebrated hero.  Good is bad and bad is good.

Churches Adopting a Foreign Language

Culture is changing church more than churches are changing culture.  To accommodate society’s new definitions, pastors have tweaked the meanings of church-related terms to ease the burden and lower the barriers to entry for an increasingly secular and skeptical marketplace.  Taking a stand for the deeper, biblical intent behind these “religious” words would risk driving away church shoppers, hoppers and seekers.  These new, less “churchy” definitions are not as intimidating, convicting or demanding for fickle church consumers:

  • Church – from people to a place or event
  • Outreach – from compassion to advertising
  • Ministry – from evangelism to church chores
  • Conversion – from surrender to repeating a phrase
  • Worship – from a lifestyle to music
  • Disciple – from obedience to belief
  • Discipleship – from intensive and personal to casual small groups
  • Commitment – from spiritual depth to organizational membership
  • Core – from the most sold out to the most bought in
  • Human Nature – from inherently sinful to essentially good (75% of evangelicals surveyed – Barna)
  • Sanctification – from an arduous process to an instantaneous event
  • Repentance – from an expectation to an option
  • Great Commission – from a mandate to a rarity
  • Holy Spirit – from filled to largely forgotten
  • Hell – from a motivating reality to an unpalatable topic
  • Heaven – from the focus of the faithful to a vague, distant thought
  • Eternity – from emphasis on the “line” to improving the “dot” (life)
  • Spiritual Warfare – from the true battleground to a surreal concept
  • Prayer – from seeking God’s will to pleading for ours
  • Fellowship – from brotherhood to social gatherings
  • Unity – from the church universal to denominational differentiation
  • Transformation – from a cleansed heart to external conformance
  • Prosperity – from storing up lasting treasures to temporary comfort
  • Discipline – from chastening of a loving Father to unfortunate circumstances
  • Exhortation – from challenging to catering

The apostle Paul spoke in the context of the culture, but he didn’t succumb to it.  Adjusting terminology to make church more attractive to a post-Christian society is a slippery slope.  Jesus is unequivocally countercultural.  We cannot stay relevant by compromising vernacular to make our faith more practical, beneficial or interesting for those learning revised definitions of biblical terms from a secular dictionary.

It’s Your Turn…

What other words with scriptural roots have our culture and churches adjusted to fit their narratives?

Will the Lord Heal our Land?

Oct 01, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
No Comments

During the pandemic, the most oft-quoted verse in Christian articles, Bible studies and meetings has been 2 Chronicles 7:13-14 – “When I shut up the heavens so that there is no rain, or command locusts to devour the land or send a plague among my people, if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.”  As America crosses the threshold of 7 million COVID-19 cases and 200,000 Coronavirus-related deaths, Christians across the country are praying for healing.  But the Lord’s healing isn’t just physical, and it has conditions.  The emphatic “if/then” statement in that verse makes a clear connection between our spiritual and moral “healing” as a precursor to physical (i.e. disease and hunger) “healing”.

Popular culture increasingly calls evil good and good evil, works to strip God out of every facet of society, and considers Christians “haters” for not actively celebrating their social values.  The resulting hopelessness apart from Jesus impacts America’s psychological health as suicides, depression and substance abuse rates reach unprecedented levels – particularly among younger generations (Gen Z and Millennials) who grew up in a post-Christian world.  Even our churches have throttled back on discipleship, compassion and accountability, concerned those inconveniences would threaten their survival during this already tenuous period in American church history.  Assuming the U.S.A. qualifies as “my people”, then 2 Chronicles 7:13-14 means that, individually and collectively, we need a remedy for our poor spiritual health before we receive healing for our failing physical and mental health.

Power of Healing

Jesus choose healing and feeding as His primary means of demonstrating compassion.  Not coincidentally, those are the same two ailments referenced in 2 Chronicles 7:13-14 – famine caused by drought and locusts, and disease in the form of a plague.  Jesus could have done any miracles to address any other felt needs.  He could have made money appear (as He did in the fish to pay taxes) and given it to impoverished families.  He could have miraculously rescued children from the clutches of abusive parents and human traffickers.  But our Savior chose to heal diseases and feed families because those miracles demonstrated God’s love and power in a way that nothing else could.  They both directly and dramatically impact our greatest concern – our health.  Nothing stops people in their tracks like physical pain and illness.  The instant we get in an accident or receive a dire diagnosis, all of our seemingly significant problems suddenly fade into the background.  Even the Old Testament foretold that Jesus would one day take our infirmities and carry away our diseases, a uniquely encouraging prophecy.  We wonder why God wouldn’t allow Satan at first to touch Job’s health until we consider the extraordinary effect that losing it has on human beings.

Likewise, the flip side – regaining our health – is a feeling of relief like none other.  Imagine taking your first deep breath in weeks following recovery from COVID-19.  Picture getting word from the doctors that you’re in remission or cancer free.  It’s one of the best days of our lives – among the sweetest words we’ve ever heard.  We celebrate having more life to live and spending more time with loved ones.  We worry ourselves sick about a child who is ill.  Parents stress about finances, but then would gladly give every dollar for their child to survive a terminal illness.

Healing also involves a core need all humans desperately crave but sorely lack during this period of social distancing – physical touch.  We miss hugs, handshakes and a pat on the back, their absence making us realize how important they are to relationships and our sense of wellbeing.  We honor heroes who bravely work in the medical field or as first responders in close proximity to COVID-19 patients, putting their own lives and families at risk.  Jesus did the unthinkable and actually touched a leper who were (considered) “unclean” and highly contagious.  Meet The Need assisted the University of South Florida in bringing medical students to Tampa Port Ministries to bring a healing touch to sailors out at sea for weeks without adequate health care.  That ministry knows what Jesus knew, that weary travelers will be more open to hearing the Gospel after receiving treatment for an illness than any other service it can offer.

There’s no greater illustration of the importance God places on physical health than the Lord’s sacrifice of His only Son to eradicate the spiritual illness of corruption in our souls.

Conditions for Healing

Our nation is offering up frequent and fervent prayers for healing from Coronavirus, yet we’re suffering from a far more serious ailment.  Many wonder whether God is allowing the pandemic to awaken slumbering believers and non-believers, using the loudest available alarm clock.  Is He touching our bodies to heal our land?  Maybe reminding us of our mortality will bring repentance and revival?

The history of Israel and Jesus’ ministry shows how generously the Lord wants to lavish mercy and dole out healing on His “people”.  But in most of those cases, He didn’t restore a person or nation to physical or psychological health unless they first…

  1. Confessed – knew and admitted they were sick. But popular culture doesn’t acknowledge the existence of sin and our churches hesitate to confront or address sin.
  2. Asked – prayed and pleaded for a cure. But are we asking for God to remove COVID-19 without satisfying the prerequisites referenced in 2 Chronicles (“turning from our wicked ways”)?
  3. Believed – expressed true faith, not that God would heal but that He could heal (if it’s His will). But does our society still ascribe that kind of power to God?
  4. Repented – promised to change if the Lord restores our health. But have we reached rock bottom like the nation of Israel often did and humbled ourselves before almighty God?

The reality is that America hasn’t met those conditions.  Its prevailing worldview is no longer predicated on being guests in God’s house but “homeowners” who make their own rules that others must follow or risk being “cancelled”.  Even our churches are anxious to get back to normal as soon as a vaccine is discovered or we reach herd immunity, yet “normal” pre-pandemic was a Church in decline in growth, impact, influence and public perception.  Rather than realizing we’re sick and pledging to change as we collectively cry out to God for help, we’re more likely to repeat life post-9/11 where any glimmer of repentance quickly faded when the threat subsided.

Need for Healing

Recent Barna studies found that compared to Boomers, Millennials are…

  • 28% less likely to say they follow the Golden Rule
  • twice as likely to say they respect only people who hold similar beliefs as them
  • less than half as likely to say life is sacred
  • far more likely to cling to revenge

Millennials are “less inclined to believe in absolute moral truth, view the Bible as a reliable moral guide, be committed to practicing their faith, pray and worship during a typical week, confess their sins, believe that God created humans in his image, and believe that God loves them unconditionally.”

The 4 year “reprieve” Christians celebrated in 2016, which I wrote about during Meet The Need’s #CastAnEternalVote campaign, has come home to roost.  A complacent church, expecting to enjoy peace without persecution under a church-friendly President, wasn’t prepared for 2020 – church without buildings, unity without racial integration (during “the most segregated hour of the week”), or neighborhood outreach without disciples.

Now we face the prospect of greater division and godlessness as social media and Artificial Intelligence inundate Americans with content to reinforce one-sided beliefs as soon as they consume a slanted, embellished article.  The automated processes that funnel biased messaging designed to drive moderates to the fringe are firmly in place and unlikely to change because they generate profitability for corporations, causes and activists.

Delivery of Healing

Christ-followers don’t have the power to heal unless the Holy Spirit chooses to work through us.   We understand the power and need for healing, but how can Christians be a conduit for delivering physical and spiritual “healing”, particularly during this age of social distancing?  We want everyone to experience the joy we’ve found, to hear the 3 words that convey the best news ever – “you are healed”!  The path God provided in 2 Chronicles 7:13-14 for healing our nation, which is growing increasingly ill by the day, calls for His Church to help America meet the conditions described in that verse…

  1. Confession – Be bold in admitting where we’ve fallen short in living out prayer, care and share
  2. Asking – Make disciples who will love their neighbors to Jesus, not simply invite them to a church service
  3. Belief – Compassionately reach out like Jesus did to “touch” a culture that is already seeing its self-centered, fragile psyche start to crumble
  4. Repentance – Follow the example of Jesus, Paul, Peter and John the Baptist who all came out of the gates calling for all men and women to turn from fruitless, worldly pursuits

As long as we define Church as an institution and don’t assign personal responsibility for the Great Commission to individual believers, then the lack of incentive and leverage to lead our nation to meet those four conditions may block its healing.

It’s Your Turn…

In this age of COVID-19 when health is such a prevalent issue and social distancing is enforced, how is your church providing physical, psychological and spiritual healing to your community?

Is Church or State More Responsible for Helping the Poor?

Sep 17, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
8 comments

No one earns salvation.  Jesus offers an unmerited gift, not an obligatory wage.  However, even a careful reading of His parables about the sheep and goats and the rich man and poor beggar can leave the impression that our eternal fate hinges on whether we ignore the poor.  The Greatest of All goes so far as to identify Himself with the “least of these”, implying we walk away from eternal fellowship with Him when we callously pass by the destitute.

For nearly 2,000 years, churches took those warnings seriously.  The Church was the food bank and homeless shelter – founded our hospitals and schools.  Yet today in America, government and ministries occupy the front lines of compassion.  We debate which political party is more concerned about the poor because the Church abdicated its central role in poverty alleviation, giving government the opportunity to usurp that mantle.  In other words, the question is not whether liberals or conservatives care more about those less fortunate – the question is whether the private sector (e.g. churches and ministries) or government should bear primary responsibility.  That philosophical difference lies largely in whether we can rely on the voluntarily benevolence of those most able to donate to help the poor or whether taxes must be imposed to compel “generosity” to fund state-sponsored anti-poverty programs.

It’s worth considering whether our nation would need a safety net if Christians in America understood the importance Jesus placed on aiding those who are suffering.  The federal government can provide help but not hope.  The Church was entrusted by God with the keys to the Kingdom, the only enduring solution to material and spiritual poverty.

What part has not following Jesus’ example of leading with compassion played in the Church’s well-documented decline in growth, influence and public perception?  If Christ, and not Christians, were truly in charge then churches would realize that sermons without service are essentially attempts to “outpreach” Jesus.  He had the perfect words yet opened ears by first demonstrating His love – feeding and healing before telling people who He is.  If we saw church as 24×7 and not an event, then the work churches do for families in need wouldn’t be seasonal and transactional, but year-round and dignified.

How Jesus Feels About the Poor

Jesus said we’ll always have the poor with us and cautioned His disciples to focus on the Bridegroom while He was still among them.  Christ left His bride, the Church, to carry on His mission “to proclaim good news to the poor”.  Those were His first public words, the declaration of His purpose – the reason He came.  Likewise, the opening salvo of His Beatitudes was “Blessed are you who are poor”, unveiling the irony of God’s economy where (spiritual and material) poverty can bring (eternal) riches, and vice versa.  Throughout Jesus’ ministry, He identified with the poor, urged His followers to care for them and flipped the script on the wealthy, stressing that the poor were more likely to be…

  1. Humble – Struggles and pain in this life make the poor more receptive to the message that they are sinners in need of a Savior (Matthew 5:3)
  2. Saved – Redeemed thinking sees oneself as unworthy and incapable, thoughts not typically associated with the wealthy (Matthew 19:23)
  3. Attentive – Acquiring and maintaining assets increases busyness and self-sufficiency (Luke 14:13, 21)
  4. Kingdom-minded – Those without treasures on earth are more likely to focus on storing them up in heaven, where “many who are last will be first” (Matthew 19:30)
  5. Christ-like – Jesus self-selected poverty, rejecting money and power (2 Corinthians 8:9)
  6. Persecuted – Christians in many nations today are suffering because they were the first to lose their jobs and the last to receive support during the pandemic (Matthew 5:12)
  7. Prisoners – The rich who reject Jesus are less likely to be imprisoned because they don’t experience hunger, inadequate legal representation or persecution (Matthew 25:43)

The affection and affiliation Jesus felt with the poor explains why He often implied that generosity toward them is the key to being “cleansed”.

What Churches are Doing About the Poor

Most churches rely on seasonal outreach events as their primary delivery vehicle for compassion.  Yet, without relational follow-up that engages families in plotting a course to a better future, those events actually do more harm than good…

  • enabling members to “check the box”, not transforming the congregation or community
  • perpetuating poverty by increasing dependence without providing tools for the under-resourced to escape their plight
  • failing to recognize the value and respect the dignity of the economically poor
  • increasing cynicism because churches retreat into their “4 walls” when the holidays are over while the poor are still hungry and hurting in January and February

America’s church growth models cater to consumers rather than challenging disciples to adopt Jesus’ mandate to serve the poor.  As a result, very few congregations are moving the needle on poverty in their communities.  The vast majority of churches…

  1. Underemphasize its Importance – Most pastors gloss over the parables and sidestep the verses referenced above that on the surface appear to link salvation to being and/or serving the poor
  2. Position Care-Share as Either-Or – Some church leaders expect a free pass by delineating between “social” and “gospel”, claiming they’re focused on the latter – but then do neither
  3. Celebrate their Kindness – Despite doing little to address poverty, and in some cases doing more harm than good, churches pat themselves on the back for their holiday outreach events
  4. Don’t Model Generosity – Leaders ask members to tithe but reinvest less than 1% in serving the poor, doing so in “convenient” ways like backpack drives, meal packing events or service days
  5. Underutilize their Resources – Facilities sitting idle for most of the week could be used to deliver career counseling, financial management classes or other services for struggling families
  6. Live in the World’s Economy – Teaching Kingdom economics, that poor is good and rich is (usually) bad, stays true to Jesus’ countercultural message but is a risky proposition for a church
  7. Lack Discipleship Depth – Fully grasping what is not intuitive and practicing what seems impractical requires a deep understanding of God’s Word and the Holy Spirit’s power

Meet The Need’s mission is to “mobilize and equip the Church to lead millions more to Christ by meeting those in need exactly where they are”.  We’ve been providing software and services to churches and ministries for nearly 20 years to enable them to bring more help and hope to the poor.  Long ago, we realized the truth of the adage “sell people what they want, but give them what they need.”  Churches weren’t looking for innovation to better serve the poor, but we built those systems anyway, became a non-profit and give our platforms away at no charge.

How Churches Could Drastically Reduce Poverty

COVID-19 is increasing the number of Americans who live below the poverty line.  Our churches have a tremendous opportunity right now to reverse the decline in impact, attendance and perception that preceded the pandemic.  The worst decision in the history of the Church in America was to separate compassion from evangelism.  Now is the time to return to following Jesus’ model and mantra that whatever we do for the least of these, we do for Him.

  1. Identify with Jesus and the Poor – As a body, humbly aspire to be “poor in Spirit”, seeing all of mankind as eternal souls made in God’s image and anyone’s misfortune as an opportunity to “proclaim good news to the poor
  2. Help in Ways that Help – Increase dignity, not the shame inherent in conveying that the rich are coming to rescue the poor.  For example, Meet The Need is rolling out an Artificial Intelligence platform churches can use to empower families to build their own lasting circles of support.
  3. Equip Members for Ministry – Gen Z cares about the poor and justice, but churches can’t reach them without innovating online because that’s where they live.  New prayer, care and share solutions extend the reach and impact of churches well beyond brick-and-mortar and Sundays.
  4. Set Scriptural Goals – Track ambitious, Kingdom-advancing metrics like “reducing material and spiritual poverty rates by X% in our community by 2025”
  5. Link Compassion and Discipleship – Like the exemplary church, The Salvation Army, establish terms of service so limited resources are invested wisely in those looking for more than handouts
  6. Don’t Get Lured into Politics – Follow Jesus in “giving back to Caesar what is Ceasar’s” and reclaim what churches rightfully own, the lead role in (material and spiritual) poverty alleviation
  7. Remember the Forgotten Poor – Keep in mind that most verses in the New Testament about collections were for giving to persecuted Christians who faced abject poverty and prison

America’s pews and online worship services are filled with enough untapped resources to eradicate poverty in America.  Government should fill the gaps, but that gap is growing because Christians only donate 2.5% of their income and 37% of evangelicals don’t give to church at all.  When churches in turn give away less than 1% of that, it is clear churchgoers and leaders don’t grasp the gravity of Jesus’ dire warnings to help the poor.

It’s Your Turn…

Are you and your church alleviating, perpetuating or ignoring poverty?

The New Era of 24×7 Church

Sep 03, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
2 comments

Our short attention culture demands a time-boxed and carefully choreographed worship service akin to “fast food”.  Yet making church more “convenient” by improving physical facilities while utilizing them less hasn’t been a solid financial, operating or discipleship model.  The days of Sunday School before worship and fellowship lunches afterward are long gone.  Businesses and service providers adapted to culture by diverting energy to more efficient and effective online options for training employees, reaching out to consumers and empowering brand advocates – 24×7.  The corollary for churches would have been web-based discipleship for members (i.e. Kingdom “employees”), digital compassion-oriented outreach to the unchurched (i.e. prospective “consumers”) and online evangelism tools (i.e. “advocates” for Jesus) – all week long.

Yet even the most innovative churches have implemented a small fraction of the digital capabilities available to them – and only those supporting a definition of churchgoers as the “consumers” rather than as the embodiment of “church”.  Streaming a weekly service, a web site, online giving and e-newsletters are primarily geared toward growing and sustaining the institution, not building and deploying disciples.

The past few months have revealed the digital divide between churches and most other facets of our society.  Lower-cost channels have long been available for churches to engage existing members, reach more people and impact the community between Sundays.  The world has gone digital – for good reason.  People want to plug in to dynamic content anytime, anywhere.  They want to run a quick search and find out what they need to know in an instant.  They want to stay in touch remotely with those they don’t have time to travel to go see – through FaceTime, WhatsApp or Zoom.  But churches don’t accommodate many of those evolving needs, still keeping everyone on their own rigid weekend schedules.

The Digital Alarm Clock

The forced migration to online channels during the pandemic has exposed the weakness of the Church’s near-exclusive brick-and-mortar orientation.  Commercial real estate is likely to suffer post-pandemic because companies in many industries have realized the benefits of remote workforces.  Likewise, many churchgoers have realized the benefits of tuning into any church they want to experience – those with a better quality of music and more dynamic speakers.  The downsides of focus on sustaining a physical building rather than innovating in discipleship, compassion and evangelism have been apparent during Coronavirus.  When churchgoers were relegated to their homes and couldn’t invite friends to the building, most were too concerned with self-preservation and ill-equipped to share their faith with their neighbors.  Now we’re learning that nearly 1/3 of practicing Christians in America did not stream online church services in August (Barna).  Those facts make it all the more surprising that the primary emphasis of church consultants and technology vendors remains providing high-quality worship services online.

COVID-19 could have been a wake-up call to a Church that was already in decline in growth, impact, influence and public perception.  Instead what we’re likely to see is simply a shift from a Walmart “store” experience to a web-based Amazon option.  Do We Really Want Church to Return to Normal or does the Post-Pandemic Church need revival?  For example, studies report the challenges churches are having reaching Gen Z, who are glued to their phones and tablets, expecting interactions and messaging measured in milliseconds on Snapchat or TikTok.  Driving to a building on a weekly basis to sit through a sermon they could find in bite-sized chunks on the web is of little interest to most high school or college students who are aging out of youth group.  Investing in improving facilities is a poor use of capital for churches who would like to access future generations.

Instead there’s a tremendous opportunity right now to expand God’s Kingdom through web-based multiplication instead of terrestrial addition.  The key to seeing the big picture is asking the right questions, not based on conventional wisdom around how churches should operate, but bold enough to think outside the proverbial box…

  • Not “How can we keep momentum going if fewer show up on Sundays?” but “How can we equip members to be more effective for Christ wherever they are throughout the week?”
  • Not “How can we keep people from leaving and window shopping elsewhere?” but “How can we extend the church’s reach to more people who don’t know the Lord?”
  • Not “How can we use online capabilities to transition people from Crowd to Community to Core?” but “How can we build online capabilities to practice Agape love better within our congregation?”
  • Not “How can we leverage our production capacity to turn this into a growth opportunity?” but “How can we leverage online tools to demonstrate God’s love to a hurting world?”

The first set of questions seeks to take advantage of digital to maintain the status quo and ensure the institution’s survival, while the second considers how digital could open new doors for Kingdom impact.

Digital: The Great Equalizer

The average church has 125 members, unable to match the facilities and entertainment value megachurches can offer in children’s ministries, music and high-profile speakers.  The high cost of operating Church as We Know It (CAWKI) – seminaries, structures, staff and sermons – create economies of scale that benefit larger churches.  The debt, fixed costs and overhead tied to those investments entraps and ensnares them in order to keep the machine running.  Many of the thousands of churches I’ve worked with over the past 20 years delayed local missions work until after building campaigns – and then often never got back around to it.  Earthly obligations can inhibit heavenly ministry.

The playing field suddenly equals when reach and impact are not determined by the size of a building or the number of people on staff.  Smaller churches can “compete” with megachurches in discipleship, evangelism and compassion through web-based channels – appearing much bigger than they actually are.   Pastors who have something important to say aren’t constrained by physical facilities.  In fact, if young kids can produce YouTube videos that are viewed by millions, a 75 member church can certainly create content of comparable quality.  With some creativity, any church leader can lead an unlimited number of women, men and children within and outside its “4 walls” into a deeper relationship with Jesus Christ.  Knocking the walls down clears the path to making and empowering disciples who personify “church” so that we don’t repeat the mistake of recent history – seeing faithful churchgoers miss opportunities to live out prayer, care and share with their neighbors.

Rethinking “Online” Church

America’s churches stand at a crossroads.  The vast majority instituted or beefed up online worship service capabilities but are praying COVID-19 will end quickly so they can return to the only version of church they ever knew.  Those less myopic see this as a “wilderness” moment, pushing pause at an already perilous time for the Church, inviting leaders to reroute toward a better future.  The pandemic is a chance to redefine “church” around people and not a place, which will require a radical shift in priorities more aligned with Kingdom goals than institutional survival.  It will call for a significant reallocation of church budgets, although overall expenditures will go down as emphasis transitions from buildings and weekend services to more efficient and effective means of equipping and empowering congregations all week long.  No aspect of CAWKI should be left untouched – reconsidering how churches communicate, connect, convene and collaborate – and taking advantage of today’s increasingly digital culture…

Discipleship

  1. Depth – Self-paced studies and journaling that go well beyond (and apply) sermons
  2. Men’s ministry – Online content and forums that engage men in 1-on-1 or triad discipleship
  3. Women’s ministry – Dedicated social networking channels enabling ladies to share and discuss relevant content from pastors, publications or Pinterest
  4. Young adults – Short, engaging content (e.g. email devotionals) every week for college students and recent grads
  5. House churches – Conduct leadership classes, launch outposts and equip with digital curriculum

Evangelism

  1. Testimonies – Encourage members to share their testimonies with friends on Facebook
  2. Children’s ministry – Produce short, impactful clips for kids through their preferred apps (e.g. TikTok, YouTube) and online parenting classes
  3. Missions – Connect weekly with missionaries across the globe for encouragement and updates
  4. Platform – Pastors create video and written content to build a “following” through multiple channels, increasing the church’s breadth and reach
  5. Small groups – Convert small groups to neighborhood groups that are intentional about praying, caring and sharing Christ with their communities

Compassion

  1. Inside Congregation – Meet The Need is starting beta tests of an Artificial Intelligence app that forms loving circles of support to wrap around families in need
  2. Outside Congregation – Meet The Need built Love Your Neighbor after COVID-19 closed church doors to enable members to post and communicate needs of their neighbors to the church body
  3. Generosity/Finances – Fewer building campaigns and more digital delivery frees up dollars for community impact, but only a Generous Church will redirect those dollars toward compassion

We’ll soon know whether churches revert to centralized (i.e. “Invite, Involve and Invest”) growth models where members are treated as “customers”.  We pray instead they’ll choose to implement many of the above recommendations.

It’s Your Turn…

Has your church moved beyond online worship services and considered how digital channels could open the door to greater depth and breadth, even for a small congregation?

Countering Society’s Attack on the Biblical Family

Aug 20, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
one comments

Restoration of America’s Christian heritage does not hinge on the upcoming elections.  While we all want to see our nation’s highest offices occupied by faithful believers, there’s a reason why Jesus tells us to “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s”.  Government runs the kingdom of this world, but Jesus leads a greater Kingdom.  Elected officials cannot solve Kingdom problems.  Instead, our Lord set up two earthly constructs to conduct heavenly business – families and churches. Those are the primary institutions God established to carry out the Great Commission.  In other words, transforming our culture into its intended, Christ-centered state starts from the bottom up, not the top down.  As leaders of our families and churches, we bear far greater responsibility for the direction of our nation than our President, Senators or Governors.

No doubt, that’s why Satan is consumed with destroying biological and church families.  Most discipleship is supposed to happen within our homes and through our houses of worship.  Yet, both family units God envisioned are being viciously attacked in today’s culture.  Coordinated campaigns were launched decades ago designed to undermine the biblical composition, roles, authority and allegiance of husbands, wives and children.  Unfortunately, churches counteracted each of those campaigns primarily with their votes and voices, attempting to impose God’s laws on those who don’t acknowledge His existence.

Modeling Agape (unconditional) love is a prerequisite for criticizing any immoral forms of Eros (sexual) and love.  Jesus was merciful toward “sinners” and harsh toward those who judged them.  The Church’s credibility has suffered immensely as it fought each new Eros battle – premarital sex, abortion, gay marriage and then transgenderism – conveying condemnation rather than compassion.  As a result, the Christian community not only lost on all of those fronts, but in the process was complicit in its own decline in public perception.

The path to reinstating the biblical picture of family and the institution of marriage in America is not legislative or judicial.  The buck stops with individual believers taking responsibility for discipling their own children and churches taking more seriously the mandate to disciple their own members.  Jesus repeatedly stressed that the latter was the more important “family” – a united, loving Church that obeys the Great Commandment and Great Commission is “My brother and sister and mother”.  A disciple’s devotion to “father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters” must pale by comparison to their love for Jesus.  Church families are made up of biological (and foster/adoptive) families who will live out in their own homes what they see modeled in their own church.

Biblical Picture of Family

Jesus came to bring division within households, called many followers to leave their families behind and abandoned His own parents to go to “His Father’s house”.  Yet Jesus validated the sanctity of marriage and command to honor moms and dads.  Society collapses without a solid familial structure in line with God’s will where faithful parents raise up godly children “in the way they should go”…

  1. Marriage – Comprised of a man and a woman (Mark 10:7)
  2. Fidelity – Undying loyalty to one another (Matthew 5:32)
  3. Unity – Alignment via an established chain of command (Ephesians 5:22, 25)
  4. Discipline – Sons and daughters need correction (Hebrews 12:8)
  5. Fatherhood – Dads play a critical role in children’s lives (Ephesians 6:4)
  6. Priorities – Family commitments don’t supersede Christ and compassion (Luke 9:59–62)
  7. Faith – Entire households believe in Jesus and follow Him (Titus 1:6)

Politicians and pastors can’t perform those functions for us.  We must shepherd our own flocks.  However, those who lead our nation and churches are largely to blame for providing ammunition to activists to undermine our Christian heritage by tearing at its underlying foundation – the family unit.

America’s (Re)Definition of Family

Centralizing church around a place, event, pastor and youth group leader has not only led Christians to abdicate their (decentralized) spiritual leadership roles within their own families but has also facilitated pointing fingers out in anger at non-believers whose aim is to break down biblical family constructs.  Rather than empowering and equipping parents, attractional church growth models have increased dependence on a “village” to teach our kids about Jesus.  However, those same “Invite, Involve and Invest” strategies also keep most youth groups from pouring deeply into children, hoping to lure parents by engaging kids in fun and fellowship.  The resulting throngs of cultural Christians lack the depth to grasp that Jesus came to serve and heal the sick, not condemn them.  Those who organize and support anti-family campaigns are no different than the tax collectors and prostitutes Jesus gravitated to, offering faith, hope and love.  In other words, defining “church” around a place and not people means most Christians today don’t reflect Jesus’ emphasis on discipleship and compassion, clearing the way for activists and media to have tremendous success in advancing their radical agenda to redefine “family”…

  1. Marriage – Two women or two men are equally qualified to raise children as a man and woman
  2. Fidelity – Personal happiness is paramount, so anyone unhappy in a marriage should leave it
  3. Unity – Partners retain their unique versions of “truth” and feelings should never be suppressed
  4. Discipline – Children need space to find themselves, including their gender and religion, so rather than meddling, trust them to make the right choices
  5. Fatherhood – Genders are interchangeable; it’s sexist to think moms can’t do everything dads can do
  6. Priorities – Sacrifice for kids, even if their activities conflict with church and helping the poor
  7. Faith – It’s immoral to influence or impose your personal worldview on the rest of the family

All of those principles hinge on the premise that human nature is inherently good.  Personal fulfillment is the ultimate objective in the absence of God.  Yet our society is experiencing record rates of teen suicide, depression and drug use.  Misplaced faith in self and human intellect always eventually implodes in on itself – we were made by God to glorify God, not ourselves.  So campaigns to redefine modern families have had to produce a tremendous amount of intensive propaganda over decades to prop up their misguided assertions.

How Churches Can Restore Biblical Families

Jesus established His definition of “family”, the Church, to help maintain order in our chaotic world.  Without any guidelines for our most basis social structure – the biological family – culture crumbles under the weight of divorce and disobedience.  However, earning the equity to speak into that culture such that non-believers will listen requires demonstrating that the biblical model “works” better than their alternatives…

  1. Demonstrate Agape love to those we don’t agree with in the face of their hatred toward “judgmental” Christians
  2. Unite across denominational lines to show anti-family activists and the media that our love for one another eclipses their worldly forms of love
  3. Serve relentlessly and pray incessantly for those who are not part of our family of Christ
  4. Return to intensive, personalized discipleship to combat high divorce and depression statistics among churchgoers
  5. Find common ground with secular society on equity and justice issues, conveying that God (and His followers) care about them too
  6. Patiently wait for their self-centered, godless picture of “family” to eventually flounder and fail, which it will
  7. When that time comes (and even before), share the Good News that the Lord has a preconceived, better design in mind for men, women and families

Fighting the culture war by electing politicians and raising up pastors who will conduct an air war, dropping more verbal bombs, won’t stem the breakdown of American families.  No amount of shouting through a louder megaphone will move that needle back in God’s direction.  The only answer is a ground war of love and compassion that wears down their defenses as they begin to realize the consequences of building their proverbial (family’s) “house” on the sand.

It’s Your Turn…

Do you think Christ sees your church family as a model for how biological families (within and outside your congregation) should operate?  Are the pastors and parents within your church taking full responsibility for their roles as disciples and disciple makers in their homes and house of worship as God intended?

Should the Church’s Goal be a More “Christian” America?

Aug 06, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
8 comments

We live in a nation divided.  Extreme factions are firmly entrenched on either side of the political aisle.  “Woke” liberals no longer tolerate opposing views, taking offense and “cancelling” anyone or anything contrary to their personal versions of “truth”.  The growing ranks of atheists and agnostics, particularly among America’s youth, consider Christian claims of exclusivity arcane and antiquated at best – ignorant and inhumane at worst.  Protests and riots rage in our streets, understandably demanding fair and equal treatment for African Americans by civil authorities following centuries of systematic racism – a sordid history vigorously confronted by most white evangelicals yet coldly condoned by others.

Many Christians believe that resolution of the stark differences fueling today’s rampant animosity and hostility lies in the outcome of the upcoming elections.  Some readers of my last blog, “Do We Really Want Church to Return to “Normal”?” conflate spiritual revival and Christendom, particularly those inclined to gauge the state of our faith with its political pull.  Nearly four years ago, I wrote a post during Meet The Need’s #CastAnEternalVote campaign questioning whether the temporary “reprieve” afforded the Christian community by Trump’s victory would simply perpetuate the status quo.  Would the presumed 4 year hiatus from mounting “persecution” under a church-friendly President simply delay the eventual abandonment of the institution-centric definition of “church” that was precipitating its decline?

Persecution typically creates a greater impetus for church reform and personal transformation than complacency.  Who would have guessed that Christianity is growing fastest in a nation where it is outlawed (China), while perhaps the fastest decrease took place where the government vehemently defended the right to worship Christ freely (England)?  As we approach the end of Trump’s first term, it’s clear the Church’s growth, influence, impact and public perception has diminished during his time in office.  Christians have lost their voice in the marketplace of ideas on college campuses, mainstream media and workplaces across the country – despite, and in part because of, their assumed association with the most powerful leader in the world.  The political clout Christians gained since 2016 has cost the Church dearly, redirecting the ire of those who detest Trump toward those he protects and defends.

“Victory” often looks quite different to Christ than it does to Christians.  External indicators of success in the proliferation of our faith do not always correlate to the internal barometers of Kingdom advancement.  It’s much easier to point fingers than to look in the mirror.  Restoring our nation’s Christian heritage must be bottom up, not top down.  It may begin with pastors preaching powerful messages, but it will end in a groundswell of repentant submission to God – measured in heart change and not church growth.  Yet changing the Church’s Kingdom measuring stick from size and status to depth and discipleship at this point may require a disruptive event – such as election results that don’t enable a return to “Church as We Know it”.

When Christ Rules

Christ surrendered His standing, taking the form of a servant. When the crowds grew largest, He preached His most challenging sermon.  He rejected opportunities to assume political power, but did not turn away from chances to show compassion.  Jesus’ strategy wasn’t to ascend to the top of the 7 mountains, but to endure torment willingly for the sake of those lost and broken.  What it looks like for Christ to be in charge looks nothing like the ambition of believers who equate His dominion to Christians being in charge…

  1. Individuals – Personal ownership of mandates to love, serve, evangelize and disciple
  2. Family – Strengthening the family unit with parents taking responsibility for raising God-fearing children
  3. Empowerment – Decentralizing religious structures, releasing rather than usurping authority
  4. Multiplication – Gospel proliferation via the Lord’s math of making disciples who make disciples
  5. Grace – Emphasizing truly important laws like mercy and justice, rather than imposing behavioral modification
  6. Generosity – Ensuring no brother or sister in Christ suffers hunger or oppression alone
  7. Compassion – Following Jesus’ model of demonstrating His love before telling them who He is

In other words, the ideal “military” strategy for breaking down the walls that divide us in today’s culture war is not an “air war”, dropping verbal bombs via a louder megaphone wielded by more powerful Christian leaders.  Instead we should imitate our ultimate Authority and launch a “ground war” with Spirit-filled troops equipped and mobilized to the front lines – with love and the Gospel as our chosen weapons.

When Christians Rule

Throughout history, those who seek and gain power, even Christians, often tend to advance their own plans rather than the Lord’s.  How else could slavery and racism have persisted for so long in a nation founded on Christian values?  We discussed earlier how Jesus’ plan never involved growing a megachurch or assuming political influence.  Yet emboldened at the prospect of having fewer credible threats under Trump, ambitious megachurches and celebrity pastors continued their location-centric, multi-site and platform-building aspirations during the past 4 years.  We’ve witnessed meteoric rises to prominence and precipitous plummets in notoriety among America’s best-known pastors.  Our institutions got bigger while our influence grew smaller.  Church leaders weren’t forced to rethink the consumer-driven “Invite/Involve/Invest” model that’s been effective in filling seats with cultural Christians but not in producing sold-out Christ-followers.  Unfortunately, the principles and priorities of theocratic ambitions tend to reward strategies that encourage…

  1. Size – Praising those who achieve statistical significance based on breadth, not spiritual depth
  2. Establishment – Promoting organizations, books and conferences featuring America’s most renowned Christian leaders
  3. Centralization – Reducing church to a place, not people, pitching “come and see” vs. “go and tell”
  4. Influence – Emphasizing leadership, legislation and elections to turn the tide in “our” favor
  5. Legalism – Expecting those who don’t know Jesus to obey His laws while not enforcing the Great Commandment or Great Commission on those who do (know Jesus)
  6. Abdication – Dependence on trained professionals to do our rightful job of leading our neighbors to Jesus
  7. Compromise – Parents relinquishing their pastoral role to the “village” to fill the void

Society will continue moving away from God if Christians follow Trump’s lead of being outspoken on social issues rather than Jesus’ lead of being bold in Prayer/Care/Share.  Non-believers are rebelling against the authority of today’s political and religious establishment.  They resent the President and Christians alike for claiming (absolute) truth when our culture teaches that each person determines their own (subjective) truth.

Putting Christ, Not Just Christians, in Charge

Churchgoers would have been better prepared to lead people to Jesus during the pandemic and pandemonium if America’s pastors had flipped the model, applying the 7 principles Jesus espoused to today’s context…

  1. Individuals – Treat members like Kingdom “employees”, not consumers of religious goods and services, training them diligently to pursue the real “customer” within their circles of influence
  2. Family – Resist temptations to keep youth group “lite” to accommodate parents who want kids to adopt Christian values, but not get so serious about their faith that they run off into the mission field
  3. Empowerment – Focus teaching less on relationship advice, and more on in-depth study of God’s Word to prepare members for personal evangelism and discipleship
  4. Multiplication – Replicate microexpressions of church across the city to infiltrate and touch each distinct group of people, understanding that future economics likely won’t support existing cost structures
  5. Grace – Advocate empathy, forgiveness and the hope of the Gospel rather than expecting those who don’t know Jesus to follow His laws
  6. Generosity – Replace the distant “God as Owner, you as steward” framework for promoting giving with a “God as Father, you as child” picture of a loving Parent who supplies all our needs
  7. Compassion – Equip members to Love Your Neighbor wherever they live, work and play; modeling empowerment, multiplication, grace and generosity

Each of those suggestions reduce the degree of power and control church and political leaders exercise over their constituencies.  Each concept is counterintuitive and unlikely to be implemented by pastors who implicitly define “church” as a place and measure Christendom’s “success” in terms of court decisions, election results and public policy.

It’s Your Turn…

Are you observing a trend, possibly driven by Coronavirus and racial division, toward the empowerment-based “church growth” principles that Jesus taught and modeled?  Or are churches still fighting to maintain the status quo, with slight adaptations to adjust to a new “normal” and any challenges they may face under a (potential) new President?

Do We Really Want Church to Return to Normal?

Jul 22, 20
JMorgan
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
14 comments

What we need is revival.  Our nation is ripe for spiritual renewal.  Our culture has been accelerating headlong in the other direction since the turn of the millennium.  There are signs that Selfism is already breaking down.  The end of that road, making yourself your own god, is Nihilism – nothingness.  Suicides, substance abuse and rampant immorality has been the outcome of seeking happiness and fulfillment in the absence of God.  Misplaced faith in science and government is diminishing as once-deified leaders struggle to understand the COVID-19 disease and protect citizens, revealing the limitations of the ultimate object of atheists’ worship – human intellect.  Doors are flung open right now to spiritual conversations.  Neighbors are scared and opportunities abound for Christians to step forward to provide prayer, compassion and answers to their difficult questions.

Yet what most churches are seeking today in this time of crisis isn’t revival, but survival.  Big “C” (universal Church) interests are taking a back seat to little “c” (individual church) sustainability.  Pastors worry about how to navigate a potential “new normal”.  They’re stressed – many just trying to figure out how and when to reopen.  Few can look past those minute details to consider the bigger picture – like why their members were more concerned with self-preservation than self-sacrifice on behalf of those who were ready to hear some Good News – but never did.

How can we return to business as usual when the Church’s growth, impact, influence and public perception has been in such rapid decline?  Isn’t this the perfect time to rethink America’s building and event-centric model for conventional church?  This blog has been questioning that status quo for 5 years, advocating a return to the biblical definition of church and its intended “customer”.  If America’s churches had followed that advice, the response from church leaders and congregants during the pandemic and pandemonium would have been vastly different.  A revival already could have been taking place right now if Christians thought of themselves as the embodiment of “church” and took it upon themselves to bring “church” to the doorsteps, iPhones and Zooms of their struggling neighbors.

However, revitalization consultants are reinforcing the status quo, providing advice within the context of “Church as We Know It” (CAWKI).  They understand that few pastors are truly interested in rethinking existing models.  Most are praying hard that the virus will go away as soon as possible, disregarding the possibility that the pandemic could be God’s will to wake our nation and His Church from its slumber.  Even those who claim to want genuine change are highly likely to revert to their comfort zones as soon as a vaccine is discovered.  Church strategists understand that we seem to have little choice in the matter.  There are simply too many empty buildings and too many pastors trained by seminaries to do one job and one job only – run a conventional church.  It’s too late to turn back now, right?  How could we risk shifting more responsibility to members for evangelism and compassion when churches desperately need them to return to the building as quickly as possible – and to bring their friends with them?  Decentralizing by equipping disciples to make more disciples at a time like this could hasten the demise of a fragile “nickel and nose” model that hinges on centralization and dependency.

Just as we shouldn’t expect a process designed for church indoctrination to produce personal transformation, strategies designed to ensure church survival shouldn’t be expected to produce revival…

Roots of Spiritual Revival

Evangelist Charles Finney, credited for much of America’s “Second Great Awakening,” said,

“If there is a decay of conscience, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the public press lacks moral discernment, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the church is degenerate and worldly, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the world loses its interest in Christianity, the pulpit is responsible for it. If Satan rules in our halls of legislation, the pulpit is responsible for it. If our politics become so corrupt that the very foundations of our government are ready to fall away, the pulpit is responsible for it.”

After visiting America in 1831, the same year of Finney’s famed Rochester Revival, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in Democracy in America,

“There is no country in the world where the Christian religion retains a greater influence over the souls of men than in America; and there can be no greater proof of its utility and of its conformity to human nature than that its influence is powerfully felt over the most enlightened and free nation of the earth.”

God is His infinite wisdom and power can accomplish all things, but America’s history of spiritual revivals points to 7 characteristics that are clearly evident in churches whenever our nation has recommitted to following Jesus:

  1. Prayerful – Unity of believers gathered in prayer, asking God to forgive sins and change hearts
  2. Repentant – Mass recognition and confession of sin, pledging obedience to the Lord’s commands
  3. Dependent – Trading “cultural” for authentic Christianity, humbly giving God all glory and credit
  4. Spirit-Led – Miracles that can only be attributable to the Holy Spirit’s presence and activity
  5. Imperishable – Shared, eternal perspective that endures suffering, knowing our future is secure
  6. Scriptural – Reverential study of God’s Word to understand and share about the life of Jesus
  7. Sacrificial – Acts of selfless, Agape love without expectation of recognition or reciprocation

Those elements found in most revivals do not align with the advice found in articles and webinars today about how pastors should adapt their churches to new realities during and after the Coronavirus pandemic…

Popular Strategies for Church “Revitalization”

A deep concern about the state of the universal (capital “C”) Church would lead to changes that could bring revival, but authors and consultants are promulgating a set of (little “c”) strategies that won’t rectify the shortcomings of America’s prevailing church growth model – flaws that have become readily apparent over the past few months.  Instead they primarily advocate the following 7 principles:

  1. Leadership – Clarity about how a church will deal with the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic
  2. Vision – Get everyone, from staff to key members, on board with future plans and contingencies
  3. Accountability – Delegate and execute responsibilities within distancing constraints
  4. Engagement – Rebuild, train and (re)activate volunteers, ministries, program leaders and groups
  5. Outreach – Create seasonal events and ads that enhance brand recognition in the community
  6. Hospitality – Once visitors respond and show up, ensure they feel at home online and in person
  7. Virtual – Continue to enhance “digital discipleship”, which is essentially just streaming services online

In other words, revitalization pitches and promises touted today are built around about getting CAWKI back up and running smoothly again.  Few call for reformation to address the discipleship deficiencies brought to light by COVID-19 when the “church gathered” forcibly became the “church scattered”…

Real Church Reform Could Spark Revival

The pandemic and pandemonium in America should lead to church reform, an entirely different set of operating principles and metrics that are in sync with the 7 characteristics of revival listed earlier in this post.  However, the path to a spiritual revival will require pastors do what they’re commanded (in Scripture) and not what their being taught (in seminary and articles).

  1. Prayer – Turn churches back into 24×7 houses of prayer, worship, compassion and service
  2. Repentance – Imitate Jesus, Paul, Peter and John the Baptist by boldly calling all to turn from sin
  3. Dependence – Make sold-out disciples through intentional, personal relationships rather than “consumers” of religious goods and services through expensive strategies and programs
  4. Spirit-Led – Equip and commission fully-empowered individuals to minister to their circles of influence, leveraging the Lord’s math of multiplication instead of building-centric addition
  5. Imperishable – Challenge believers to die to self-interest and surrender, crucified with Christ
  6. Scriptural – Reemphasize personal study, journaling and apologetics to share Christ effectively
  7. Sacrificial – Deploy Prayer-Care-Share “missionaries” throughout the city, acting as pastors of their neighborhoods

Lord willing, revival will come when reform leads to a reversion to the biblical definition of “church” and its intended “customer” – to make disciples who reach the “lost” in the community and across the globe.  Tactical “revitalization” won’t bring revival because it will remain centered around a building, event and pastor – a model proven ineffective before and during this pandemic and racial strife.

It’s Your Turn…

Do you know of a church refusing to return to “normal” and undertaking significant reform along the lines we’ve outlined in this post?  Please share how you see that church possibly contributing toward a much-needed revival…